Inconsistencies in the Bible with regards to the Resurrection
With malice towards one & all
Read each of the four Gospels' accounts of Jesus resurrection. Start with Mark, then read Luke and Matthew, then finally read John's version (this is the order that most historians agree the Gospels were written chronologically). Also, read Paul's account of Jesus resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15, most likely written at the same time or even before the Gospel of Mark. What you'll see is that the story of Jesus resurrection changes each time, and gets more embellished each time as well. This is, to me, one of the most important inconsistencies in the entire Bible. An analysis of the language of the Gospels reveals that each story builds on the one before it, and yet embellishes it to reflect the changes in Christian doctrine during its first century of development. Each author of the Gospels (we don't know who they were, but none would have been eyewitnesses to Jesus based on the dates) had a particular agenda when writing their version, and many scholars who have studied the original Greek texts have proven this.

Extract from a Newspaper article written by VIR SANGHVI
Is Jesus Christ a God, a Legend or a Myth?
At most Indian airports, you'll find copies of Holger Jensen's book on Jesus's Kashmir years on sale. Jensen picks on the persistent Kashmir legend that a tomb of a holy man who is buried in the valley is actually the tomb of Jesus Christ.
According to this legend, Jesus did not die on the cross. He fainted and was taken away by his disciples. A couple of days later when he was better, they moved him to a safe location (this explains the missing body and the Resurrection) and then, he went off to Kashmir where he lived and preached for many years.
NOTE:-An Arab crucified in Damascus in 1247 took two days to die.